Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 Professor, Department of Wood and Paper Sciences and Technology, College of Agriculture and Natural Resources, Karaj Branch, Islamic Azad University, Karaj, Iran

2 M.Sc., Department of Wood and Paper Sciences and Technology, College of Agriculture and Natural Resources, Karaj Branch, Islamic Azad University, Karaj, Iran

3 Associate Prof., Department of Wood and Paper Sciences and Technology, College of Agriculture and Natural Resources, Karaj Branch, Islamic Azad University, Karaj, Iran

Abstract

The influence of different dosages of surfactant and soap in the deinking of wastepaper is investigated. The results showed that the dosage of 0.25% soap generated highest brightness and lowest opacity. However, the dosage of 0.75% soap produced highest tensile and burst strength and 0.5% soap produced the lowest spec (dirt) index. In the case of surfactant application, the dosage of 0.75% surfactant produced highest brightness and 0.5% surfactant generated lowest opacity. Application of 0.5% surfactant showed highest tensile and burst strength and lowest dirt index. The combined effect of both chemicals showed that the combined dosage of 0.75% surfactant and 0.25% soap produces highest brightness but the dosage of 0.25% surfactant without soap produced lowest opacity. Highest tensile and burst strength was related to pulp deinked using 0.5% surfactant and 0.75% soap. The results indicated that the combination of 0.75% surfactant and 0.25% soap generated highest brightness which the important property of the writing and printing paper. The highest tensile and burst strength was measured in deinked pulp produced using 0.5% surfactant and 0.75% soap.

Keywords

-Beneventi, D., Manera, L., Carre, B., Gandini, A., 2003. Dynamic surface tention of flotation deinking system: from model surfactant mixtures to process water, Colloids and Surfaces J, A, Physicochem. Eng. Aspects, Vol: 219, 201-213
-Borchardt J.K., Matalamaki, D.W., Loti, V.G., Grimes, D. B., 1997. Two methods for deinking sorted office paper, TAPPI J, Vol80, 269-274
-Drelich, J., Pletka, J., Boyd, P., Raber, E., Herran, D., Luhta, E., Walgui, H., Tervo, N., Boston, S., Wieland, J., Morgan, J. and Sabo, N., 2001. Interfacial chemistry aspects of deinking flotation of mixed office waste. SME annual meeting proceeding, Feb. 26-28, Denuer, Colorado, pp: 1-9.
-Hache, M. j, A, Brungardt, J. R, Teodorescu, Munroe, D.C., 1993. The color stripping of office waste paper with sodium Hydrosulphite, 2nd Research froum on Recycling, Canada, 111-116
-Kim, H. J., Kim, S. B., Kim, C. J., 2007. The Effects of Nonionic Surfactants on the Pretreatment and Enzymatic Hydrolysis of Recycled Newspaper, Biotechnology and Bioprocess Engineering, 12, 147-151.
-Oh, J. K., Park, K. N., Park, J. W., and Kim, J. H., 1997. Effect of HLB value of surfactant on enzymatic deinking process. J. of Industrial and Engineering Chemistry. 3(1): 7-12.
-Pala, H., Mota, M. and Gama. , F. M., 2006. Factors influencing MOW deinking: Laboratory scale studies, Enzyme and Microbial Technology, Vol38, 81-87
-Sameer, R., Vivek, V., 2011. De-inking of waste paper, Novel techniques and methodologies, IPPTA J. 23, 149-152.
-Spence, K., Venditti, R. and Rojas, O. J., 2009. Sugar surfactants in paper recycling, Nordic Pulp and Paper Research Journal, 24(1):107-111
-Technical Associatim of Pulp and paper Industry, 2010. Tappi Test methods, Tappi press, Atlanta, GA. USA.
-Zhao, Y., Deng, Y. and Zhu, J.Y., 2004. Roles of surfactant in flotation deinking. Progress in paper recycling, 14(1): 41-45.
-Zhenying, S., Shijin, D., Xuejun, C., Yan, G. Junfeng, L., Hongyan, W., X. Zhang, S., 2009. Combined de-inking technology applied on laser printed paper, Chemical Engineering and Processing: Process Intensification, 48, 587–591.