Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 Assistant professor, Department of wood and paper science, Behbahan Khatam Al Anbia University of Technology, Behbahan, Iran

2 MS.c., student, Department of wood and paper science, Behbahan Khatam Al Anbia University of Technology, Behbahan, Iran

3 Full Professor, Department of wood and paper science, Karaj Branch, Islamic Azad University. Karaj- Iran

4 Assistant professor, Department of forest science, Shahrekrod University, Shahrekord, Iran

Abstract

The goal of this study was to determine the modulus of elasticity and modulus of rapture of two kinds of date palm (Khasi and Hajmohammadi) using static bending and dynamic (flexural vibration) techniques. To reduce the difference between static and dynamic stiffness values, the static bending modulus of elasticity was modified by taking into account the value of the shear deflection. In addition to, for better understanding of the mechanical properties of date palm, values were compared with those measured for poplar samples. The results showed that, in Khasi the mean values of the modulus of elasticity obtained by flexural vibration, the static modulus of elasticity, the modified static modulus of elasticity and as well as the modulus of rapture were 47, 67,68 and 38% less than those measured for Hajmohammadi respectively. In comparing with date palm, values measured for poplar samples were more pronounced. The difference between dynamic and static values of modulus recorded for Khasi, Hajmohammadi and poplar samples were 63, 40 and 19% respectively. After modification of the static values, the difference was reduced in to 3% for Khasi, 6% for Hajmohammadi and 7 % for poplar experimental samples. Finally the significant correlation coefficients were found between the static and the dynamic modulus of elasticity for both two kinds of date palm.

Keywords

Main Subjects

-ASTM., 2002. Dynamic Young's Modulus, Shear Modulus, and Poisson's Ratio of Refractory Materials by Impulse Excitation of Vibration, Methods C1548-02.
-Bremaud, I., 2012. Acoustical properties of wood in string instruments soundboards and tuned idiophones: Biological and cultural diversity, Journal of Acoustical Society of America, 131(1): 807-818.
-Bucur, V., 2006. Acoustic of Wood, CRC Press, New York, pp. 420.
-Cho, C.L., 2007 Comparison of three methods for determining young's modulus of wood, Taiwan Journal of Forest Science, 22(3): 297-306.
-Ebrahimi, G., 2013. Mechanics of wood and wood composites, University of Tehran Press, 4th Edition, pp. 646.
-Haines, D.W., Leban, J.M., and Herbe, C., 1996. Determination of Young's Modulus for spruce, fir and isotropic materials by the resonance flexure method with comparisons to static flexure and other dynamic methods, Wood Science and Technology, 30(4):253-263.
-Halabe, U.B., Bidigalu, G.M., Gangarao, H.V.S., and Ross, R.J., 1997. Nondestructive evaluation of green wood using stress wave and transverse vibration techniques, Material Evaluation, 55(9):1013-1018.
-Hassan, K.T.S., Horacek, P., and Tippner, J., 2013. Evaluation of stiffness and strength of scots pine wood using resonance frequency and ultrasonic techniques, Bio resources, 8(2): 1634-1645.
-Horacek, P., Tippner, J., and Hassan, K.T., 2012. Nondestructive evaluation of static bending properties of scots pine wood using stress wave technique, Wood Research, 57(3):359-366.
-Hunt, J.F., Zhang H., Guo, Z., and fu, F., 2013. Cantilever beam static and dynamic response comparison with mid-point bending of thin MDF composite panels, Bio Resources, 8(1):115-129.
 -Liang, S.Q. and Fu, F., 2007. Comparative study on three dynamic modulus of elasticity and static modulus of elasticity for Lodgepole pine lumber, Journal of Forestry Research, 18(4):309-312.
-Madhoushi, M., Daneshvar, S., 2014. Evaluation of modulus of elasticity in standing trees and sawn wood in populous deltoids using nondestructive stress wave testing, Iranian Journal of Wood and Paper Industries, 5(1): 11-20.
-Roohnia, M., 2016. Wood: Acoustic properties, book chapter, Elsevier Inc,  Reference Module in Materials Science and Materials Engineering, doi:10.1016/B978-0-12-803581-8.01996-2 1.
-Ross, R.J., Pellerin, R.F., 1994. Non-destructive testing for assessing structures: A review. Technical report. Madison, WI, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Forest Product Laboratory, 40p
-Sales, A., Canadian, M., and Cardin, V.S., 2011. Evaluation of the mechanical properties of brazilian lumber (Goupia Glabra) by nondestructive techniques, Construction and Building Materials, 25(3): 1450-1454.
-Smith, W.R., 2001. Wood: acoustic properties, In: Encycolpida of materials, Science and Technology, Elsevier Scienece Ltd, London, 9578- 9583.
-Smulski, S.J., 1991. Relationship of stress wave and static bending determined properties of four northeastern hardwoods, wood and fiber science, 23(1):44-57.
-Tarmian, A., Foroozan, Z., Sepehr, A., Gholamiyan, H. and Oladi, R., 2013. Physical and anatomical features and drying behavior of the boards produced from old date palm trees (Phoenix dactylifera L.) in Bam city, Iranian Journal of Wood and Paper Science Research 28(3): 498-508.
-Tranishi, M., Koizumi, A., and Hirai, T., 2008. Evaluation of quality indexes of bending performance and hardness for hardwoods, Journal of Wood Science, 54(5): 423-428.
-Wang, S.Y., Chen, J.H., Tsai, M.J., Lin, C.J., and Yang, T.H., 2008. Grading of softwood lumber using nondestructive techniques, Journal of materials processing technology, 208(1-3):149-158.
-Yang, J.L., Ilic, J., and Wardlaw, T., 2002. Relationships between static and dynamic modulus of elasticity for a mixture of clear and decayed eucalypt wood, Australian Forestry, 66(3): 193-196.