Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 Ph.D., Dept. of Wood and Paper Science & Technology, Islamic Azad University- Kraj branch – Iran

2 M.Sc., student Dept. of Wood and Paper Science & Technology, Islamic Azad University- Kraj branch – Iran

Abstract

In this investigation, anatomical characteristics of Iranian native woods from Ulmaceaefamily: Ulmus glabra, Ulmus carpinifolia,Zelkova carpinifolia,Celtis australis have been compared. These 4 woods are similar and have been used in Iranian historical buildings and their identification would be important.Among 4 species, Zelkova carpinifolia is somehow similar to Celtis australis while, Ulmus glabrar is close to Ulmus carpinifolia. Boundary cells of rays in Zelkova carpinifolia and Celtis australis are bigger than inside cells of rays. The difference between Zelkova carpinifolia and  Celtis australis are in ray width. Ray width of Celtis australis is 7-8 cells, whereas Zelkova carpinifolia 5- 6 cells. The color of soluble (Glycerin + water)which have been used for softening of wood samples(2× 2 cm)for Zelkova carpinifolia got golden color but others grey. The difference between Ulmus glabra and Ulmus carpinifolia are in appearance of rays. The appearance of  Ulmus carpinifolia’s ray is short and wide while ray of Ulmus glabrar is tall and slender. Meanwhile the frequency of rays in cross section of Ulmus carpinifolia is 6-8 per millimeter but in the case of   Ulmus glabrar the figure is 4-5.
 
 

Keywords

Main Subjects

-پارساپژوه، د و ف، هانس شواین گروبر. 1372. اطلس چوبهای شمال ایران. انتشارات دانشگاه تهران، چاپ دوم. 136 صفحه.
-پارساپژوه، د، م، فائزی پور، ح، تقی­یاره. 1375. حفاظت صنعتی چوب. انتشارات دانشگاه تهران. چاپ اول. 657 صفحه.
-ثاقب طالبی،  خ ، ت  ساجدی، ف،  یزدیان. 1384. نگاهی به جنگلهای ایران. انتشارات موسسه تحقیقات جنگلها و مراتع. چاپ دوم، 27 صفحه.
-حجازی، ر. 2537. اصول تشریح چوب. انتشارات افست مروی. 154 صفحه..
-حسینی،  ض. 1379. مرفولوژی الیاف در چوب و خمیر کاغذ. انتشارات دانشگاه علوم کشاورزی و منابع طبیعی گرگان، 288 صفحه.
-نیلوفری، پرویز. 1364. چوب شناسی. انتشارات دهخدا. 581 صفحه.
-Core, H. A., W. A. Cote & A.C. Day. 1979. Wood. Structure and identification. 2nd Ed. Syracuse University Press, Syracuse.
-Carlquist, S, 1988. Comparative wood anatomy. Springer . Pp 52.
-Cox, M.J. 1941. The comparative anatomy of the secondary xylem of five American species of Celtis. Amer. Midland Nat. 25: 348-357.
-Franklin GL.1945. Preparation of thin sections of synthetic resins and wood-resin composites, and a new macerating method for wood. Nature 155(3924):51–59
-Hoadley, R.B. 1990. Identifying Wood: accurate results with simple tools. The Taunton Press, Newtown, CT.
-Hoadly, R. B., 1990. Identifying Wood. Taunton Press, Inc. pp 104-105.
-IAWA Committee. 1989. IAWA list of microscopic features for hardwood identification by an IAWA Committee. E.A. Wheeler, P. Baas & P.E. Gasson (eds.) IAWA Bull. n.s.10: 219--332.
-Jane, F.W. 1970. The structure of wood. 2nd Ed. A. &C. Black Ltd., London.
-Metcalfe, C.R.& L. Chalk, 1950. Anatomy of the dicotyledons. Vol. 2. Clarendon Press, Oxford.
-Panshin, A. J. & C. de Zeeuw. 1980. Textbook of Wood Technology. 4th Ed. McGraw-Hill Book Co., New Yourk.
-Sweitzer, E.M. 1971. Comparative anatomy of the Ulmaceae. J. Arnold Arbor. 52: 523 – 585.
-Wheeler, E.A., C.A Lapasha. & R.B. Miller, 1989. Wood Anatomy of Elm (Ulmus) And Hackberry (Celtis) Species Native to the United States. IAWA Bulletin n.s., Vol. 10 (1), 1989: 5-26.
 
-Wilson, K; Biol, F. 1986. The anatomy of wood. Stobart & Son Ltd., London. Pp.119.