Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 Wood and Forest Products Science Research Division, Research Institute of Forests and Rangelands, Tehran, Iran,

2 Ph. D. professor of wood and paper Dept., Tehran university , Faculty of Natural Resources.

3 Wood and Paper Science Research Division, Research Institute of Forests and Rangelands , Iran,

Abstract

The application of regressions models for pridicting physical and mechanical properties of laboratory produced particleboard was studies. In order to study the influence of mat moisture content gradient, particle geometry, press time and temperature, 108 boards were produced.
Regressions model indicated that particle geometry significantly influenced board MOR, increasing the slender ratio of particles, improved MOR. Regressions models of MOE indicated that both particle geometry and mat moisture content gradient significantly influenced board MOE, and increasing the slender ratio of particles and mat moisture content gradient, increased MOE. regression model of IB indicated that all of the variables have significantly affected IB. However, in this case, increasing mat moisture content gradient, particle geometry reduced IB and press time and temperature increased IB, moisture content gradient and particle geometry had  more effective.
 
The results indicated that moisture content gradient and press time significantly influenced the regression model of thickness swelling after 24 hours soaking in cold water. 

Keywords

Main Subjects

Chelak,W.; Newman, W.H.1991. MDI high moisture content bonding mechanism, parameters and benefits using MDI in Composite wood products. In :Maloney, Thomas M., Proceedings, 25th International Particleboard/Composite materials Symposium, 1991. April 9-11, pullman, W.A. Pullman, W.A.,WashingtonState University: 205-229
DIN Standard (No. 68763) . 1990. Flat pressed particleboard for use in building Construction.
Geimer, R.L.; Kwon, J.H. 1999. Flakeboard thickness swelling. Part II : Fundamental response of board properties to steam injection pressing. Wood and Fiber Sci. 31(1) :15-27.
Harless, P.E. ; Wagner, F.G. ; Short, P.H. ; Seale, R.D. ; Mitchell, P.H. ; Ladd, D.S.1987. A model to pridict the density profile of particleboard. Wood and Fiber Sci. 19 : 81-92.
Hata, T.; Kawai, S.; Sasaki, H. 1990. part 2 : Computer Simulation of temperature behavior in particle mat during hot - pressing and steam - injection pressing. Wood Sci. Technol. 24:65-78.
Hawke, R. ; Sun, B.; Gale, M. 1993. Effect of fiber mat moisture Content on physical properties of polyisocyanate - bonded hardboard. Forest Prod. J. 43(1) : 15-20
Kamke, F.A.; Wolcott, M.P. 1991. Fundamentals of flakeboard manufacture: wood-moisture relationships. Wood Sci. Technol. 25 : 57-71.
Myers, G. 1986. A comparison of hardboard manufacturing by semi-dry and wet processes. Forest Prod. J. 36(7/8) : 49-56.
Namioka, Y.; Anazawa, T. 1981. Conditions of hot pressing of particleboard bonded with urea resin: The effects of the moisture content of a mat before hot pressing upon the thickness swelling and strength properties of the boards. Journal of the Hokkaido Forest Product Research Institute. No. 351: 1-3.
Oudjehane, A.; Lam, F. ; Avramidis, S. 1998. A continuum model of the interaction between manufacturing variables and consolidation of Wood composite mats. Wood Sci. and Technol. 32: 381-391.17 ref.
Rauch, W. 1984. Temperature and vapor pressure courses during particleboard production and their influence on board properties. Holz-als-roh-und-werkstoff 42 : 281-286(German).
Stewart  H.A. ; Lehmann, W.F. 1973. High quality particleboard from cross- grain, Knife - planed hard wood flakes. Forest Prod. J. 29(3) : 52-60
Strickler, M.D. 1959. Ettect of press cycle and moisture content on properties of Douglas -fir flakeboard.Forest Prod.J. 9(7): 203-215.