Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 PhD., Wood science & Technology Department, Natural Resources Faculty, University of Tehran, Karaj, Iran

2 Professor, Wood science & Technology Department, Natural Resources Faculty, University of Tehran, Karaj, Iran

3 Assistant Professor, Wood science & Technology Department, Natural Resources Faculty, University of Tehran, Karaj, Iran

Abstract

    In this study, structural performance of corner joint reinforced by fiber reinforced polymers (FRP) at the area of maximum tension stress was investigated under diagonal tension loading. Therefore 1 to 3 layers of unidirectional woven Glass, Carbon and Kevlar fibers were used and hand lay-up was done by vinyl ester and epoxy resins. Results of load-displacement curve at yield point exhibited capability of the reinforcing layers in preventing joint opening to some extent under load. However, failure was observed at the joint due to picking fibers from wood surface or members fracture near the interface when loading increased. Since the reinforced zones of the joints by FRP show the maximum shear stress, consequently the separation of fibers from wood surfaces increased at these locations. The adhesion of FRP layers to joint surface was not appropriate due to difficult process of layering at right angle of joints followed by probable formation of air bubbles. The results of assessing FRPs reinforcing behaviour indicated that application of vinyl ester in comparison with epoxy as matrix exhibited better performance. In addition, glass and carbon fibers showed better performance than Kevlar fibers as reinforcing agents.

Keywords

Main Subjects

Abdolzadeh, H., Layeghi, M., Ebrahimi, G. and Ghassemieh, M., 2014. Study of stress capacity improvement of L-type joint by chemical modification of wood. BioResources. 9(3): 5302-5310.
-Beheshty, M.H. and Rezadoust, A.M., 2005. Reinforced plastics (Polymer Composites). Tehran, Iran Polymer & Petrochemical Institute, 446p.
-Biblis, E. J., 1965. Analysis of wood- fiberglass composite beams within and beyond the elastic region. Forest Products Journal. 15(2): 81-88.
-Campilho, R.D.S.G., de Moura, M.F.S.F., Barreto, A.M.J. P., Morais, J. J. L. and Domingues, J. J. M. S., 2009. Fracture behavior of damaged wood beams repaired with an adhesively-bonded composite patch. Composites: Part A. 40: 852-859.
-Chen, C.J., 2007. The study on improved mechanical properties of reinforced traditional Chuan-Dou timber joints in taiwan. Journal of Cultural Property Conservation. 1(3): 5-14.
-Dagher, H.J. and Lindyberg, R., 2000. FRP-wood hybrids for bridges: a comparison of E-glass and carbon reinforcements. Proceedings of ASCE conference, Philadelphia, USA, 7–10 Ma:1-8.
-Daniel, F.W., Lawrence, A.S., and Robert J.R., 1997. Feasibility of fiberglass-reinforced bolted wood connections. Madison, Wisconsin, Forest Products Laboratory.
-Ebrahimi, G., 2007. Engineering design of structure of furniture. Tehran, University of Tehran, 491p.
-Gustafsson, P. J., 2003. Fracture perpendicular to grain - structural applications. Timber engineering. S. landerson and H. J. Larsen, Wiley & Sons.
-Raftery, G. M., Harte, A.M., and Rodd, P.D., 2009. Bond quality at the FRP-wood interface using wood-laminating adhesives. International Journal of Adhesion & Adhesives. 29: 101- 110.
-Snow, M., Chen, A.A.Z. and Chui, Y.H., 2006. North American practices for connection in wood construction. Progress in Structural Engineering and Materials. 8(2): 39-48.
-Tankut, A.N. and Tankut, N., 2004. Effect of some factors on the strength of furniture corner joints constructed with wood biscuits. Turkish Journal of Agriculture and Forestry. 28: 301-309.
-Tannert, T. (2009). Structural Performance of Rounded Dovetail Connections. Vancouver, Canada, British columbia University. PhD Thesis.
-Tannert, T., Lam, F. and Vallée, T., 2010. Structural performance of rounded dovetail connections: experimental and numerical investigations. Eurpean Journal of Wood and Wood Product. 69: 471-482.
-Wangaard, F.F., 1964. Elastic deflection of wooden- fiberglass composite beam. Forest Products Journal. 14(6): 256-260.